25 new reasons to stop the whining and get started

I’ve mentioned Belén before haven’t I? This fresh-mouthed creature is currently my housemate, and she’s getting pretty damn good at being a person that lives in the same apartment as me. Today she made me dinner, and when you get served medium rare burgers with proper heinz ketchup (not the tomato sauce crap that goes on sausages here) and aioli, you forget everything about eating healthy. Hell, I even ate two.

BUT, the reason I’m writing this post is because she found something truly amazing online today, and shared it on facebook.

It is a post made by Chuck Wendig about, quote title, 25 Lies Writers Tell (And Start To Believe). Holy potato, thats some enjoyable reading! And, the best part about it, it can apply to other things that writing stories. In my case, I apply it to telling stories with my camera. Voi voi Integrated Media, I think this might qualify as an appropriation? Maybe not.. Anyways. It also makes me think of how people should look at this in relation to their work in general, and perhaps even studying.

One of my favorites are “I don’t have time!”
HIs claim is that we are all have the same amount of hours in a day. Alfred Hitchcock didn’t have 5 more hours every day than anyone else, neither did Stephen King. If someone is getting all their work done in time, and still have more fun socialising than you, they still have the exact same amount of time as you. GET THE &%#$#$ OFF FACEBOOK AND START DOING STUFF!! You have no excuse.

Another good one is “I have nothing more to learn”
This is just too good, it deserves a quote:

“Oh! And by the way, any of those writers who tout that line: “You can’t teach someone to be a writer, you either are a writer or you aren’t” are high on their own stench and just want to make themselves feel better. What kind of fucked-in-the-head lesson is that? You’re born a writer or you’re not? We’re beholden to some kind of creative caste system? It’s in our blood, like vampirism or syphilis? You can be taught. And you can teach yourself.”

 

There is ALWAYS more to learn. You might know all the technical specifications on your camera, but you’ll never know all the ways you can use it. Huh.. Thats kind of sad, but kind of good. Oh well.

“I need (insert some bullshit here) to help me write”
Ooooh this one hit me right in the diaphragm.. I’m lousy at this. I constantly make excuses for getting stuff when I’m studying. “Oh, I need some chocolate to motivate myself to work” or “some coke zero would do the trick to wake up my creativity”. I guess that’s just part of being a spoilt brat, thinking I need a reward to do some actual work. I don’t need shit from now on. I’ll do my god damn homework without petrol.
OI that’s where it all came from!! My parents tricked me with that when I was a kid! “Come on Sunniva, we’ll just go a little further and you’ll get some chocolate”. Geee, thanks mom and dad, no I can’t do decent work without rewarding myself.

Or maybe it was because I was crazy cute as a kid (I’m the one to the left)

“My crap isn’t as crappy as some other crap!”
Yeah I do this to. I compare my work with others, and as long as it is equally good I’m happy. To be fair, if I feel like I’m performing bad, I panic, but still, as long as everyone else is doing lousy work, I’m not too concerned that my work isn’t that good. Pretty lucky all my friends are really hard workers I guess..

This applies to my food habits as well! If you eat more than me, it doesn’t matter that I ate more in a day than what a poor tribe member in Africa did in two weeks. Ouch that’s pretty bad. I mean, yeah.

Aaaand finally, “I suck moist open ass!”
Keep telling yourself that and you’ll never succeed.

 You have one of two choices: you can be destructive to yourself or constructive. You can tear yourself down or find a way to build yourself up — and I don’t mean build yourself up with compliments but build yourself up with skills and abilities and the practice that gets you there. You suck? That thought sucks. Get better. Improve. Aim big. Give yourself the chance to fail — and then give yourself a chance to build steps from the corpses of your failure so you may climb higher every time.

 

I’m hoping I’ll be able to apply some of this to my work. Having someone yell some sense into you (in writing) is sometimes really useful.

I’m definitely buying some of his books. Go ahead and read the whole thing, I dare you.

Share

Hypertext examples.

After reading the supporting evaluation of these works you will need to write a blog entry(s) that answer the following questions. Your responses will be discussed in the upcoming lab.

What is your favourite hypertext example?
Why is it your favourite?
What characteristics in this work would you adopt for your own hypertext essay?

(Please note in the discussion that follows I will use the word ‘page’ to refer to a web page and the word ‘essay’ to refer to a hypertext essay.)

So I looked through the four examples given. I think they are all good for different things, depending on what you’re after.

Stuart Moulthrop’s ‘New Literacy and the Great Age of Code’ is very informative and easy to read, but not very interlinked. It is structured in a way that differs from the hypertext essay that we are going to make, as it is linear and doesnt allow you to go anywhere but to the next page of the essay. At the end it goes back to the start, but in the middle of the essay you can only continue to the next page (unless you use the back and forward button on your browser of course).

The second example is also good, and resembles an essay in many ways. It is made out of mainly text, with the exeption of the image on the side that visually tells you where you are in the essay. It allows you to jump to any part of it that you’d like, which I found clever and very useful. However, it is very academic (which I am sure it is intended to be) and not really something that caught my attention.

The third one is a mix of text and image, and it almost bacame a bit to complicated to follow. “Webs are constituted by their links, not their linearity”
Adrian Miles explains in the introduction that “The web pages that make up this site use the HTML <meta> tag to provide a client side push where pages are loaded serially. You can attempt to intervene at any point by clicking on an image, a word, or a letter. In most cases where a link is available it will randomly place you back into the series, however in some cases the HYPERWEB ‘expels’ the reader.

If you simply let the pages cycle then the HYPERWEB will take about 6 or 7 minutes to return to its beginning, but if you intervene you can end up anywhere.”

Like he explains, you are lead through the hypertext essay without having to do anything yourself, it goes automatically to the next page (note: not a random page, they have numbers). However, you can press any link you wish, which will lead you to somewhere random in the essay. It then continues to go.

I liked this one because it is visual, unpredictable, and impressive. It is inspiring to see what can be done in a hypertext essay.

As for the fouth example, we are told that it is more a form of internet art than a hypertext essay, but i really don’t see why it doesn’t qualify completely. It contains just as much information and links as any of the other, and it includes images as one of the key elements. Maybe because it isn’t so much an essay, but more a collection of stories about the authors body?
However, I think I preferred this one to the others, probably because I have an interest for film and photography and are like many others cued by images just as much as text.

AND THE WINNER IS:

My Body: A Wunderkammer, by Shelley Jackson.

Like I said, I prefer this because it is so visual. It is also an easier read; because it is personal and written in a casual tone, it is more entertaining than the others. It might also have something to do with the fact that I’m female, and can compare my own experiences with hers regarding the body. I think the way she leads you through the essay, or you might say her body, is unpredictable as the links doesn’t always tell you exactly where you will end up.

She might have chosen to make it so unstructured and unpredictable for entertaining purposes, but I think all the links leading to different pages are a way of showing the body as an interlinked unity. Everything is linked on the internet, and the same applies to the body.

The characteristics from this work that I want to adopt to my hypertextessay is the interlinking, the images, and the writing style. So far we have been writing in a very casual tone, trying to make it interesting/informative and enjoyable at the same time. We depend a lot on images; our “front page” is mainly made out of different images, and just a little text. The other pages consist of both.
We are in the process of linking everything, and we want links that makes sense and links that don’t. Shelley Jackson only links to other pages in her essay, while we are linking to pages outside the essay as well.

There is much left to do! Writing, coding, linking.

 

Share