Blog goes bye bye

But only for school purposes! I will definitely keep up the blog writing after this is submitted, and who knows, now that I don’t feel the pressure of getting it marked it might evolve into something amazing. I have gotten a new found love for my camera, and now that I have a place to share my photo’s I imagine that this can develop into a wonderful relationship.

The blog has been an interesting companion through this semester. At first I was extremely disappointed when I found out that part of our course would be on blogging, and complained for weeks. However, the blogging part of Networked Media has been the part I have enjoyed the most, and possibly learned the most from as well. It has been a great place to document and reflect upon my progress in HTML and knowledge about the network, and with the slightly interlinked cluster of RMIT blogs there is always inspiration and motivation to find.

So here they are, my chosen ten. It was harder than I thought, choosing only ten. Not because my blog is flourishing with amazing posts, but because I have put a lot of effort into most of them, as this subject is an unknown area for me. But like they say, sometimes you have to kill your babies (or how is it again?), and I had to get rid of some.

The first post I wrote was very forced. I had a slow start and wasn’t very enthusiastic about Networked Media. On top of that Norway got struck by terror. I’m sure most people know so I won’t go into detail.
However, it got to a point where I felt so behind that I forced myself to write something.
When I look back at it, it wasn’t really that bad. Overall I think it is a good first post, it’s very personal and I tried my very best to link it up to the course material.

The second post I have chosen is one of the first proper posts I managed to write. Like I said, it went slowly the first weeks. I think at this stage I decided to get a grip and try to learn as much as I could, who knows I thought, maybe HTML and blogging might be the future. This post is notes from a lecture, but I put a big effort into researching the different things that were mentioned.

Number three! I feel a bit sneaky for choosing a post that I used in my Annotated Bibliography, but then again it wasn’t part of the required posts, and I am pretty sure I lost some marks because it didn’t fit the description of an annotated bibliography (too long..). I really tore “Blogging thoughts: personal publication as an online research tool” to pieces in this post, looking at almost everything they brought up with a critical eye. I think this post shows that I didn’t just skim through the test for the annotated biblio, I put some effort into understanding it.

So now I’m intrigued.. I picked this post because it is good and within my field of interest. However, it is not very relevant for Networked Media. It fitted the timeframe for where I could choose posts from, and it is a way better post than the small scribbles I did around that time that is related to the course content. I’m hoping that this period of not to hard focus on course material can be forgiven, as I have improved a lot towards the end of this semester.

The fifth post is a short review of the work on the hypertext essay. I ended up in a different group than what was originally planned, but I was fortunate and was teamed up with Rosa. Being only two people demanded a lot of work, but we had fun. Buffy joined our group towards the end and helped out. Here’s what we got so far

Number six is a dive into the blogging world. Like I have mentioned earlier, the blog has really grown on me and I have spent some time online getting more information about blogs. This was a small experiment that linked me to the online world even further.

In blog post number seven I got a closer look at my main area for socializing, in other words, Facebook. I learned many new things about it, the majority of it was actually quite shocking.

I found HTML quite challenging, but tried my best to learn it. In post number eight I tried to apply different HTML codes to my blog to see how much I were allowed to do within it. It is quite short, but I had funk making it and I now have the codes I used stored for as long as I keep my blog going.

Post number nine is about a range of different things, but mainly about The Whole Earth Catalog. It has been said that it was a version of a blog and of Google before those things even existed. Interesting stuff that I would consider adding to the course material!

And then finally, number ten. It is actually the last post I wrote before I started on this final summary of my blog, and come to think of it, it is a nice way of finishing off. I started with my very first post, and ended with the last one (at least the last one that will relate to this semester). It is about Gifs and how you make one yourself, and I’m definitely going to make gifs a common part of my blog.

Hugh asked everyone in class if they were going to continue blogging after this semester, and I think everyone said yes. I’m sure I’ll be back here as soon as I’ve gotten that god damn Authorship essay out of the way..
Much interesting stuff happening in Melbourne at the moment…

Share

Lecture week 9

I will tidy this up tomorrow, I’m way to tired to start on it now. I will also answer these questions:

  • What happens if there is no beginning, middle or end?
  • How will links change the way you structure your essay?
I had a really productive Networked Media day, and have done a lot of work on the hypertext essay. Yay!
Here’s my notes from the lecture:
Adrian Miles on hypertext

Web hypertext system, http, html. but only one type of hypertext, the biggest one and the one that took of.

Timberbox? Tinderbox? Storyspace – hypertext fiction/non-fiction

Early theory: hypertext can and ought to include the following: writing and dialogue, modern pathways,

Text singular in terms of narrative(fiction, sport, doco)

Strict linearity is unessasary in hypertext. In essay, everything that contradicts the main narrative is avoided. You’ve been trained.

In twentieth century, this not so common? Things are spreading out; traffic, money, biology (structures), also text.

Single person in the middle seeing everything, while you can be in the periphery looking at him.

Print is linear, beginning middle end. Writing in dialogue: all writing is dialogue, with text surrounding it.
When you see a romance film, you know it is a romance film because you recognize the elements within it. Cultural taught. Dialogue with the writer and the text and the writer.

Text writing you; when an idea arrives without knowing where it come from (experience of something else).

Hearing a song for the first time, still knowing what the next line is going to be. Logic and previous experience gives expectation of whats to come next.

Essay, no pun, no personal comment, opinion. Dry, third person voice. Report stores away, and the progress of writing it is lost.

Introduce the personal and the social into your writing. No longer be discrete and selfcontained. Link across documents. We take it for granted.

Linearity. Not in hypertext, only a middle. Only connection between paths. Doesn’t need a center.

“Traditional forms of writing have tended to emphasise a consistency of tone and writing style that is a product of print technology. At its heart, there is a certain protestant suspicion of textuality in our development of black print on white papet arranged in highly regular patterns across consecutive pages.

This singularity of writing style or voice iis the exception, rather than the rule, of our communicative competencies. In any given day I speak as father, son, husband, teacher and student, to name a few, and each requires, often literally, a different voice and style.

Hypertext writing, through all of its formal properties, is able to utilise and incorporates these different voices, these different ways of writing. Hypertext theory seems to validate the inclusion of these diverse tones (or tongues) so that the document becomes not only a palimpsest of what has gone before or into the writing but becomes a plural arena of all those writings that are implicit but excluded in all writing.”

No pictures in writing. Black on white, protestant German. Scientific writing. More strongly protestant than black and white. NO images.

Catolic churc? Bleading. Catholoc invented printing, maybe different?

If writing reading is about knowledge and joy, why no colours. Don’t leave your webpage black and white!!

There is no single voice. Multiple voices. Celebration in hypertext, we can use whichever voice we want. Not like the strict essay writing.

Definition. Digital, computer, multi linear writing and writing system. Called soft media.

Multimedia, most important definition?

Films hypertext? Pulp fiction with a multi linear narrative.

Pragmetic reason: Hypertext needs to involve a computer. Have to make sense.

Not linear, not an object with a linear form. There is no page 2. No pages in here. Only ever be read as a multi linear form. Look at page 36, in hypertext that means everyone would have a different page. In book, it would be the same.

Books are going to disappear. Like opera, moving to a specialized art community.
100 journals in a bookshelf, or everything gathered in one piece. Books becoming designed objects, because they’re not acquired anymore.

3rd reason. Digital and linkning. Hypertext made up of link, internet link structure. Link creates paths, connects to anything. Picture, text, movies, music.

Each shot is equally far apart. Every webpage are equally distance from each other. Do not have to follow, no bound structure. Link is a promise, might go where it say it will, might not. Moment of risk, you don’t know exactly. Protestants and catholics. Protestant links sleep around, like teenagers. Raising the links. If going to homepage, it has to say home. Anxiety around links?

Indecent links. How will it affect my work? People might loose interest,

Think of your links as drunken teenagers, messy. Edit always a risk, what is it going to link to. Juncture and disjuncture.

Reading and writing.
Huckleberry Finn: there might be different interpretations, but text is still the text. This sentence follows this sentence. In hypertext that is not the case. It can be rules on reading history, showing new available screens. Exercise: everyone sit down and read for fifteen, then pause, then fifteen, then pause, and on third time people realise it is like listening to music. Repeated reading.
Repetition is fundamental. Each person who reads it will go different ways.

Cinematic? Put shots in different order to create different narrative. Each note is self-contained. Multiple relations between those paths.

You can dream about it all your life, but you are not a filmmaker before you actually start making a movie, so you’re not a hypertext writer until you actually write hypertext.

No one knew about editing, 50 years it took before anyone thought of it. Same with hypertext. Editing/links.

Which words to link from and why? Everyone link from nouns! Make it more interesting. I love my mum. Link from love. The more abstract the word you link from, it changes the way your writing works.

No front page or last page on the internet. Navigation menu or links in the text?

Therefore, hence, thus, all assume linearity. They are GONE in hypertext writing. “Earlier” doesn’t make sense to the reader, cause earlier might come later. LINK IT.

Good point: you don’t write a blog post in relation til every single blog post you’ve ever made. People can understand it without reading the whole blog first

Your essay cant have a front page.

We create hypothesise based on patterns (compare to The Big Sleep). We want to create meanings. Patterns in language, and in hypertext links creates patterns.

If you can read the pattern, the connections becomes richer.

A link that says home can send you somewhere else

No dead ends in an hypertext: ALWAYS LINK SOMEWHERE!! Remember for essay. Repetition is OK. Remember to write crucial information, because someone might come to a random page (not the “front” page) and won’t be able to understand the context.

Share

Participation?

Yup yup, a quick update on how well I think I’m doing in this course.

Just to refresh your (and my) memory, here’s the first post I made about participation.
The second post contained a list of things I would have to follow in order to earn a good grade, and I think I have been doing an alright job with it. Lets double check.

1.     Attend 80 – 90% of all lectures and tutorials
So. I have missed three lectures, but only one of them should be counted. The first one I missed was because of the terror attack in Norway. If I remember correctly I did get to the lecture in time, but walked out because I started crying.
The second time ws my fault, I had a long weekend with a lot of work, and slept in. SHAME on me.
The third time was so annoying.. I’m usually five minutes late, which means I have to race as fast as I can on my bike on the way to school. This usually results in me being sweaty and tired in every lecture. On this particular day I got up a bit earlier than usual, and enjoyed riding to school without rushing. However, when I arrived (ten minutes before the lecture) it turned out that the key to my bike lock was gone. So I had to go all the way back home (20 minutes ride) and then to uni again. I did read up on what the lecture was about on other students blogs, and I also went through the slides.

I think I’ve been to every tutorial? I’m pretty sure. Yup lets just say that.

2.     If by any chance I miss a lecture, I’ll look at the notes online
Boyah, there we go, I’m checking this one. Good girl Sunni.

3.     Do all the essential readings, and not just read through it, but also understand the content.
Check, all the readings plus some more.

4.     Do 80% of the extra readings (with the same objective as nr.2)
Hah, good job, there isn’t any.. I have watched a lot of tutorials for web design online, hopefully that will count.

5.     Minimum four blog entries every week
Blogging frequently has probably been my biggest strenght in this course. Not so much in terms of academic updates, I’ve put more effort into making the blog my own. I haven’t counted, but I’m pretty sure I’ve blogged at least four times a week, often more.

6.     Understand and be able to write and publish HTML
Getting there, slowly but steady. I’m lucky to have Rosa Gollan as my hypertext partner, she seems to know quite alot about it and she has offered to help me out. However, I know far more about coding than what I did in the start of the semester.

7.     Seek information outside school, on other people’s blogs and pages relevant to the course.
Check. I never thought I would say this, but I’ve actually started reading a few blogs. It gives me inspiration to write and ideas of what to put on the blog. Like I mentioned earlier, I have also been looking at different tutorials online to help me with my coding.

8.     Work towards meeting the required learning objectives in the course guide
I would say that I’m well on my way to reach this goal. I’ve gotten a quite different look on text in relation to internet, and on internet in general; there’s a world of oppertunities there, and I think it is important to have some understanding of how it is all bound together.
However, there are still four more weeks to go, and much to learn.

So far I’m doing pretty good I’d say :)


Share

Ideas..

SunnyRosa

In lack of a group for the Hypertext Essay I teamed up with Rosa Øø. She is actually one of the few I know that is louder and more energetic than me, so I think it will be a lot of fun! ..and noise ;)

Apart from those obvious benefits of having her as a partner, she is also quite ahead of me when it comes to HTML, so I might learn a few things! She made a webpage which is about me in the snow haha, check it out here

So. This weeks tute was the first one where we went into discussing the hypertext essay.
We did the Wall Visualisation Task

A wall visualisation technique will be used to get the design of the hypertext essays underway.

The key objectives of this exercise are to:

 

  • Identify the main priorities in the design and production of your hypertext essay.
  • Provide an opportunity for every group member to have input into the design process.
  • Establish the intent of the hypertext essay and what type of experience you want your users to have.

Hugh had us write up this:
- One word that describes the experience one will have when they see our page
- Three word that describes how we want to do it, how we want to create that experience
- Four words that describe why we want to do it like that.

I think I might have messed up the order here.. but I’m pretty sure it was something like that. Here’s a photo of me taking a photo of my post it notes.

And here’s some of the notes

The Idea

I swear on my cat’s health, if anyone steal this idea I’ll go full viking on them.. Without going into detail I can only say that it will not be pleasant.

From: Jon Thorsen, http://www.stateunit.co.nz/gallery.html

Now that you’ve been warned, here’s the plan

If you look at the notes I made, there is one drawing of a person sitting in a cloud, surrounded by his/her thought bubbles. Because there has been so much talk of being “on the cloud” as a reference to being online in this course, we thought it was a good and direct link to that. The reading we did the annotated bibliography on is called “Blogging thoughts: personal publication as an online research tool” so we found that the thought bubbles would support the theme article in relation to the hypertext essay.
This is the basic design that we have planned, and we’ll do the design in Photoshop. We might use one of us as the person sitting in the cloud, since we’re the authors behind the hypertext essay and it’s our thoughts about the article Blogging Thoughts, but we’ll see how it turns out.

Each bubble will link to a page which will contain information about one subject in relation to the essay; information about the authors, what is a blog, etc. From those pages there will be several links, leading to other blogs, pages with information, and completely unrelated things. Seth talked about how a link could be surprising and lead somewhere unexpected, and how this makes it more interesting.

I think we both have this image in our head of how it is going to look, and in the planning fase that we are in right now, it looks pretty cool. The only problem is that a lot of the things we want to do with it requires Flash.. If we’re lucky we might be allowed to use some of it.

This post functioned perfectly as procrastination.. I think i might do some actual work on this hypertext essay now. Gah

 

Share

Annotated Bibliography #5

How the text relates to themes in the course Networked Media – why was it chosen?

This is an article about the use of weblogs in research, and keeping and maintaining a blog is a big part of this course. The blog’s we keep can be seen as meta-blogs; blogs about other blogs. Keeping track on this involves a big amount of research, mainly on the work that other people have already done.
Mortensen and Walker write about the use of weblogs and how they can function as a professional tool but also a personal one; they claim that it is just as useful in both arenas. In comparison with this course, we have been encouraged to fill up out blogs with information that interests us, not only entries with relevance to school. Both of the authors claim that having a blog made it easier staying focused on their research, but also that it helped them as a tool of research. This might be one of the intentions behind encouraging the students to add their own “touch” and content to the blog; it might help them in the right direction in regards to their future career.

Adrian Miles, a Senior Lecturer in New Media at RMIT, claims that “blogs are very useful to document your practice, to encourage and support reflective and process based learning, to nurture peer support and learning, to provide a record of achievement, in assisting idea creation, supporting collaboration, and finally in developing multiliteracies that allow participation within contemporary information ecologies as creators, rather than being limited to being passive consumers.” (Miles, 2006) Miles was part of the team that established the use of blogs for the bachelor of Communication (Media) in 2005, and seeing as it is still in use, it must have served its purpose. Like Mortensen and Walker was at that time, he is using the blog as an equipment for his PhD research. From his article “Blogs in Media Education: A Beginning” the main idea behind having a blog in this course is to somehow link it to the research we do in class, and if we have something we are working on outside school.

The HTML part of this course can’t be related to the article, because they decided to focus on personal experience and a more “user friendly” approach, in stead of numbers and statistics. I still think that HTML is an useful tool while keeping a blog, as it allows it to construct your posts (to some extent) as you wish. One part of me wish that I had to read all the three articles that are available for this assignment, as the two others is about Hypertext and Spatial montage, which seems to be very interesting topics. When I find time for it I will try to go through them, as they in many ways (especially the Hypertext one) can be related to blogging.

References:

Miles, Adrian. “Blogs in Media Education: A Beginning.” Australian Screen Ed.41 (2006): 66-9

Mortensen, Torill, and Jill Walker. “Blogging Thoughts: Personal Publication as an Online Research Tool.” Researching Ict’s in Context. Ed. Andrew Morrison. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2002. 249-79. p.259.

Share