Archive for May, 2012

Class Feedback

Friday, May 25th, 2012

In today’s tute, we showed Paul, Robin (just realised these are the names of my aunty and uncle. Weird) and the rest of the class the rough cut we’ve put together so far.

The feedback regarding what needed work was as I expected it. That bloody first scene. It is simply too boring and we’ve done ourselves a disservice with coverage. Paul highlighted that while an outside first AD was advantageous in that their primary concern was to keep the ball rolling in terms of the schedule, they’re not perhaps quite as attached as an RMIT student first AD might be (who would put more emphasis on ensuring all coverage had been taken care of).

How do we solve this problem? Paul and Robin agreed that if the film was made even more overtly dark and whacky, cutaways of a creepy house exterior would intercut well with Petunia’s monologue. The pair think this is achievable, particularly given the odd nature of the story complete with police assault and corpse concealing.

Shifting the film’s tone to one of surrealism and expressionism can be achieved with a few editing techniques with colour balance being the most obvious choice. Making this transition will also remedy another perceived flaw of Paul and Robin’s: the lack of context surrounding Sarah’s actions. For them, Sarah’s motive is unclear but they feel that by integrating elements of the avant-garde into our film, the need for such expository will no longer exist.

Sounds like we’ve got a bit of work to do but I feel heaps more confident today after receiving some clear steps to take in the next week. The class also complimented us on our shot design and casting amongst other facets of the film.

Learning From Mistakes

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Reviewing footage in the edit suites today, the advantages of cast auditions became pretty clear.

This fact was made most pointedly when Michael (Randall) and Sylvie (Petunia) acted alongside one another. While Michael keeps his performance consistent across takes, Sylvie tends to add a new action or two at particular points of dialogue during multiple takes. This obviously poses a problem in post-production when trying to cut together shot/reverse shots.

I had thought our approach toward reaching into theatre circles or contacting friends with past acting experience was a standout choice – particularly given the student film aura surrounding our project (time constraints, dedicating time to developing skills in other areas). In retrospect, auditions would have warned us about something like an inconsistency in performance; such a thing can be picked up on during the script read-throughs that take place. Even something like this could’ve probably been remedied via rehearsals with Sylvie; a sort of workshopping process would best prepare an actor for the shoot day. In the future, I will always run auditions unless I have it on good authority that the prospective choice for a role has performed well in past film shoots.

Tuning In

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

“Listening is perceiving sound with careful and responsive discrimination. It is thinking about sound – analysing its quality, style, interpretation, and nuance. It is trying to understand what motivates a sound. It is engaging in new sonic experiences regardless of their strangeness. It is examining your reaction to sound in relation to your mood and feeling.”

Stanley Alten’s observations in Audio in Media detail a fairly autonomous human response to sound. It’s how much importance you choose to place on such a response that will determine whether or not you can produce a true-to-life sound design.

The soundscape in our opening scene is feeling pretty dull and almost distracting in its silence. The remedy for this: a radio segment playing in the background. It was my job to record this and I chose to structure the piece as a callback sequence. I devised a script I thought best emulated such a moment in radio and was careful not to infringe copyright laws with the radio station I created (99.8 Upstart FM). I posed as a host and was very deliberate in my choice of guest – a friend who I believed would have listened to real call back pieces with the “careful and responsive discrimination” that Alten regards.

“Dialogue patterns are inherent in the writing” but Alten notes that the author of the script must be aware of the “sound and content” that will feature in the project. The dialogue patterns, then, work around the sound and content. I wrote the following with this in mind (for the purpose of the short film, a screenplay layout with the help of a screenwriting program like Celtx didn’t seem necessary):

Host: Now, this morning, we’ve been having people call in and tell us about what their weird and whacky occupations get them doing for a living and right now we’ve got Jim on the line – Jim, how you going this morning?

Jim: G’day, Frankie, I’m good.

Host: That’s good to hear, now what do you do for a living, mate?

Jim: I’m an undertaker.

Host: An undertaker! Oooh, must deal with some pretty dark stuff there.

Jim: (laughing) Yeah, definitely running out of ways to brighten up my day, haha.

Host: Ahh, whatever pays the bills, eh? Now Jim, what’s the weirdest thing to happen to you on the job?

Hopefully this and the rest of the radio piece hold up in our short film. There might be a bit of playing around with tonal qualities and Garageband effects (I’ve already added a ‘Telephone Lines’ filter to Jim’s dialogue to give that callback radio feel).

Post-Credits Scenes

Saturday, May 19th, 2012

Last night, I finally got around to seeing The Avengers and lawdy, it didn’t disappoint! This was a film that didn’t take its superhero/action genre too seriously which allowed for a comedic license uncommon in films of the same nature (ruptures of laughter arrived when nemesis, Loki, had his malevolent speech interrupted by the Hulk, who proceeded to throw him around like a ragdoll).

As always, I anticipated and wasn’t disappointed by the obligatory post-credits scene that has become integral to Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) films. It got me thinking about the scene in relation to my film group’s post-credits scene. What’s attractive about these scenes in the MCU context? There’s the promise of a sequel and a hint at its content – a certain privilege granted to the movie-goer that feels private to a degree (at least to me anyway).

But what about the context of our film? I guess the way it has been constructed, the scene ties off thematic and character elements of our short (tones of dark comedy and a re-emphasis of Petunia’s love for Norman are what come to mind upon viewing the scene).

I think the development of the post-credits scene, while a small one, is one we can be proud of as having devised in this modern cinematic era. You’d be foolish to think audiences these days would be willing to sit through an opening sequence that credits the entire cast and crew (as was the case in classics many decades ago. Though I guess crews were much smaller then considering the absence of special effects teams, stunt teams, etc.). Post-credits scenes entice the audience to sit through the credits and hence offer their attention to people who deserve it. Watching a five minute reel of credits seems a small price to pay for a cinematic Easter egg.

Covering Coverage

Friday, May 18th, 2012

Today marked the first day our team got to sit down and mull over converted footage in FCP. Christine popped in to offer some advice – some that required footage we did not film on the day. Why didn’t we get this coverage? Essentially, our shot list didn’t incorporate some of the suggested shots Christine mentioned today. It’s no biggie: we’ve all come to realise that there’s ways of getting around holes in the story. Establishing the link between Petunia and Sarah, for instance, will come about through using a static shot of Sarah before she throws a scone at Randall even though it was shot as part of the sequence following the scone throw.

If there’s anything I can take from this, it’s probably to be more wary of different ways of approaching storytelling during pre-production. Sure, we could’ve filmed alternate ways of telling the film’s story and decided which looks best in post-production, but if you’ve got a knack for seeing the bigger picture, you should be able to discern the best way to convey the story from a cinematographic viewpoint before the camera’s even rolling.

Structure Concerns

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

I’ve always got the bloody ‘repetition brings structure’ theory in my head and now it’s interrupting K-film production (and probably rightfully so).

Our prompt is “life is a journey of self-discovery”. Initially, I thought this would be an interesting idea to explore in making the sketches but I can’t believe I couldn’t see how broad the topic is and how difficult it will be to bring structure to the piece. We’re already so deep in sketch production to turn around now. But where’s the repetition? What is the relatively transparent rule linking the sketches together?

In watching past student K-films, it seems the rule of repetition can appear at two fronts. For something like ‘Manipulate Her Emotions’, the repetition comes more from a sketch production level. The repetition (with a touch of variation) is clear in each of the sketches and the sketches are unified by the universal theme they share. Our sketches are majorly lacking in this department.

The second take on the rule of repetition I notice (and one I think we can potentially pull off) is in the interface structure (that is, at a K-film production level). While Exquisite Corpse displays repetition in certain SNUs (the boy with the flipping notepad features as the playing clip or a thumbnail in every SNU), the repetition seems to come mainly from the K-film’s layout in terms of consistency and interface choices (playing clip in top left hand corner, thumbnails of equal size forming a square with the SNU). Thumbnails of equal size to an in-motion sketch seem to work well for a series of sketches that don’t have clear repetition in the content filmed.

Thinking back to my solo K-film though, I guess I didn’t film the content with repetition in mind. How did I unify the SNUs then? I achieved structure predominantly through text I think. Each of the group members have filmed sketches individually. Do we have an interface based around a pattern of threes to distinguish the three personal journeys being displayed? I’m confused as to which path to take and I want help.

Moar K-Film

Monday, May 14th, 2012

The less a fragment narrates, the more possibilities of connection it has (think of Lego bricks).This is the model of the blog.We are applying the same logic to film making in a Korsakow film.

A pretty valuable idea to keep in the back of your mind when shooting sketches. Let the K-film be read in a variety of ways – ones that we direct our audience to but ultimately allow our viewers to pursue due to their agency over the film. Blog posts are similar to sketches in that their size is small – and are hence less narration-dense – and are linked to other blog posts via hyperlinks – there is no “predetermined structure”.

We should also feel less restricted in how we structure our sketches. Think of the Kuleshov effect: it can be assumed that any snippet of video will link up to another video and “still make sense”.

Hard media: A computer is used but the publication becomes “hard”, a tangible object (DVD, tape, digital file to be broadcast, etc.)

Soft media: Digital affordances reserved in the point after publication (eg. random access).

Korsakow film is soft video. Extracting it will eliminate the non-linear component of the K-film. Soft copies retain the “digital affordances” of the K-film.

Seeing the combination of film and still pictures Adrian has meshed together has given me an idea for a sketch. I could cut together archival footage on my Mac and experiment with a warped version of the aforementioned Kuleshov effect – two seemingly unrelated films will become related via spatial montage.

‘Buzz’ Shoot: Reflections

Sunday, May 13th, 2012

The big scary production phase is over! How did we go?

In my opinion, the day went better than I initially expected. Despite trying to talk down my fears, I had been feeling small apprehensions going into the shoot but I needn’t have worried! Here’s a gallery to attest to our productivity and fun times:

Getting the ball rolling was a little rough: we started shooting almost half an hour after we were scheduled to. Problems associated with this were lighting and Petunia’s (Sylvie) movement through the space as well as her delivery of lines. By lunchtime, we were back on schedule again having completed the kitchen scene and all outside scenes with almost no obstacles whatsoever.

During the break, the crew played back some of the footage on Sacha’s laptop and found some of the clips were underexposed (alarmingly so). I then played it back in VLC instead of the program we had been using for playback (MPEG Streamclip) and found these clips were considerably more lit. Phew!

Despite our break, I feel our crew, definitely including myself, may have felt on a high or a little too relaxed following the morning’s proceedings and we struggled through the shoot in the living room with Petunia and Norman (Ray). Problems here concerned shot angles, whether to do the scene in one long take (which we ended up doing) and the handling of the camera (Jax brought along an easy-to-use Wally Dolly but we had to tilt and track simultaneously).

After shooting the living room scene, we found we were still well on schedule and had ample time to record the post-credits sequence along with additional bits of Petunia’s movements around the house and cutaways. The crew wrapped a little before 5:00 (our designated wrap time) and the day was considered a great success!

Now for editing…

Clearing the Air

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

“Meanwhile Thomas feigns surprise that what I talk about actually happens outside the classroom. (As if.)”

To be frank, I’m not in the mood for having my blog discussion undermined like this. I think there’s been a misunderstanding, I’m not surprised something mentioned in a lecture “actually happens outside the classroom”, its the fact that now that I’m tuned in to this understanding of the repetition rule, I’m not only noticing it, I’m understanding why it becomes an innate part of our being; we structure projects with repetition autonomously. If Adrian’s lecture hadn’t enlightened me about repetition’s role in structure, I’d have just overlooked the repetition at play that structures Treed’s blog. In writing this, I was just trying to link a real-life situation to a theory brought up in a lecture.

3 Days to Go…

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012

Our crew visited our film location for the last time before the shoot date, this time with 1st AD, Jax, in tow.

Being as inexperienced as our crew is with lighting (we’ve only really looked into lighting two lectures ago), it’s been handy having Jax on board. He’s a third-year Film and Television student at Swinburne and knows his stuff. Jax and the rest of the crew get along well so the shoot should go seamlessly not only from a productive point of view but also he can lend a hand with lighting a set.

Our crew has discussed at length that we shouldn’t be stressed out – in class, we’ve seen the other film group in our tute engage in non-stop discussion about a variety of elements in their film. I think our crew have been equally interested in our own film but, to be honest, ours just isn’t as grand-scale and demanding as theirs (we’re using four characters instead of the ensemble cast the other crew have opted for and our script is limited to just over three pages – potentially just over three minutes in screen time). In this sense, I’m remaining pretty calm about the shoot day and think that what our film demands of us as a crew is definitely achievable.