Monthly Archives: October 2011

Participation

Final Summarising Post

My blog demonstrates a real progression over the semester. One of my first blogs, Don’t blog? Well, you should displays my initial reluctance to blog however this disintegrated after the lecture on blogging given by Seth that made me realise there were different ways of writing ideas other than through essays. Whilst earlier blog entries were based solely on lectures and tutorials my later blog entries began to branch out and incorporate my own interests with Networked Media. I also feel as though the personal tone I drew on at the beginning of the semester now successfully combines a more academic style of writing giving my entries an element of sophistication. Half way through the semester my blog also underwent a layout change and I began to implement tags which demonstrates my awareness that visual texture is just as important as text when blogging. One of my initial blog entries, worriedaboutreadings@hotmail.com illustrates my engagement with Landow’s assigned reading. Whilst this blog entry successfully shows how I have applied an assigned reading to Networked Media, the blog entries titled Robert Altman’s Spatial Narratives and Shaun Gladwell – New Media Art elicit my ability to apply my own personal interests and observations directly to the material learnt in this subject. In particular, the two blog entries above emphasise my progression towards utilizing more academic writing and also reflect my engagement with spatial montage that formed as the reading for our hypertext essay.

Not just a technology, but also an ideology is a blog entry that I wrote on the notion of ideology and the internet when questioned by Hugh in tute. This concept got me thinking about another subject, Communications Histories and Technologies so I wrote a blog that assisted me in understanding how exactly the two subjects are indeed very similar and how the internet has progressed and been adopted in society. This blog was proceeded by Comms and Networked get along that asserts the similar practice of applying alternative academic theories and communications history to Networked Media.

Hugh Davies continued… forms as a blog entry that exemplifies my grasp of hypertext, including both its strengths and limitations. Moreover, I felt it was the one lecture I comprehended the most out of any of the lectures given. This lecture prompted my decision to begin hyperlinking blog entries more often and can be identified in my final participation blog, FINAL FINAL FINAL PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION BLOG BLOG BLOG, that forms as evidence that I have. I chose to incorporate my final participation blog entry as I feel it neatly summarises all of the goals and how I have or have not achieved them in this course. Additionally, the Adopted-a-blog entry successfully shows how I have progressed given I am now able to analyse a blog in regards to the ideas we have covered in lectures. The blog entry, Spatial Montage in Networked Media is the last blog entry that I have spoken about given it conveys how I have been able to grasp the main aim of Networked Media which is essentially learning different ways of writing in the Network. Aside from the different methods of writing I list in the blog entry, the actual process of writing when blogging has formed as the most interesting way of writing in the network. Ultimately, my blog has formed as a zone where I have been able to develop ideas and share them amongst others. I have been able to find my own voice when blogging that I feel accentuates my online presence and offers more freedom outside of University to express an alternative form of writing to that of an academic style.

Participation

Searching for blogs. Attempt #1

1. Spatial montage in Networked Media… is the first blog entry that I would like to draw upon as it successfully conveys that I understand why exactly we study Networked Media and how indeed we are adopting new styles of writing in the network.

2. Hugh Davies continued… shout out to hypertext. This blog entry exemplifies my grasp of hypertext, both its strengths and limitations. Moreover, I felt it was the one lecture I grasped the most.

3. Comms and Networked get along… conveys how I am able to grasp material from other subjects outside of this course and apply it back to the course.

4. Robert Altman’s Spatial Narratives… another blog entry that demonstrates my ability to apply outside course material to the course. In particular, I like how I have adopted sound as opposed to visual material to exemplify how spatial montage can be applied to a number of mediums.

5. worriedaboutreadings@hotmail.com 

6. Not just a technology, but also an ideology

7. Adopted-a-blog

8. FINAL FINAL FINAL PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION BLOG BLOG BLOG

9. Mercedes Benz gets interactive

10. Still thinking of a number ten. I’ll get back to you Barry.

 

 

Uncategorized

Comms and Networked get along

In the final tutorial for Networked I spoke to Hugh about the relevance of Communications Histories and Technologies. I found it interesting that he touched on the subject as I have often related Networked and Comms in regards to how the printing press has developed and been remediated to a new, modern digital and online format that is applicable to contemporary society and therefore, Networked Media. In particular, I was interested in the concept of remediation studied in Comms and how this is applicable to the notion of spatial montage given older media technologies such as multiple graphic user interfaces, video games and television news reports have refashioned traditional modes of cinema.

The alteration of older forms of media to create new digital media is demonstrated through the concept of spatial montage, or the split screen technique that is continuously developing within cinema. Old forms of media can be utilised to remediate film narrative by viewing multiple screens within a single frame. This is becoming more prevalent within contemporary society and whilst no full feature length film is yet to be made using the concept, it has appeared frequently as a convention in comic book adaption films. Moreover, the new media artwork, My boyfriend came back from the war by Olia Lialina (1996) exemplifies how this non-linear form of narrative is applicable to film given it constructs a visual narrative on multiple screens, fostering audience active participation in cinema.

Spatial montage is a termed coined by Lev Manovich who outlines that spatial montage could involve a number of images, potentially of different sizes and proportions, appearing on the screen at the same time to construct a non-linear narrative” (2001). This concept stems from contemporary societies subjection to dense information surfaces. Furthermore, our ability to “switch our attention rapidly from one program to another, from one set of windows and commands to another illustrates that we find multiple streams of audio-visual information presented simultaneously more satisfying than the single narrative stream of traditional cinema” (Manovich 2001). Ultimately, the multiple screens presented through older forms of media such as the multiple graphic user interfaces on computers, video games and television news report have been refashioned and implemented within cinema to create a new viewing experience.”

Participation

FINAL FINAL FINAL PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION BLOG BLOG BLOG

Over 12 weeks I wrote four participation blogs entries that I have successfully adhered to. My first participation entry was titled, The Participation Father: Part 1. When reviewing this blog entry I realise just how off track I was on the first day of this subject. It provides a broad understanding of participation in this subject that I have subsequently made more specific in The Participation Father: Part 2, The Participation Father: Part 3 and The Participation Father: Part 4

In my second participation blog entry I set goals based on attending all lectures and tutorials, creating 3 blogs entries a week and devoting 8 hours of study to this subject. To date I have attended (or partaken) in every single lecture for this subject and have also attended 11 out of the 12 tutes (missing one on account of being ill). Additionally, I have put in at least 8 hours study a week. These hours have been devoted to completing three blog entries religiously each week, watching videos posted by Seth to assist the HTML coding process, working on the annotated bibliography and also the hypertext essay. I have completed three blog entries each week based on the lectures, the tutorials and a topic of my choice that relates directly back to the subject. However, I intended to create one blog entry a week based on a specific reading but have failed to do this given I have dedicated only four blog entries to the set readings. Admittedly, since the annotated bibliography I have focused heavily on spatial montage and neglected blogging and hyperlinking. Furthermore, I also set a hyperlinking requirement for my blog entries that I kind of adhered to. Perhaps I was a bit too lazy with adding links however some blog entries demonstrate an excessive amount of links. The texture of my blog undertook some additional changes to enhance my readers experience by making it more engaging expressed through links and also a new layout to make it visually pleasing. Moreover, I also stated that I should use the programs mentioned by Seth in the first lecture, particularly with group assignments. This was successfully implemented given I am continuously using Cyberduck, Drop Box and Delicious in relation to the hypertext essay to not only to create web pages but also to communicate more easily with group members.

In the third participation blog entry I noted the criteria above in addition to some new additions…additions.

1. Critical assessment evaluation. Speak to peers and tutor Hugh about project work that I’m a bit uncertain about.

Overall, I rarely felt that I had to speak to Hugh outside of class as a lot of my queries were dealt with in the online videos. However, in class I consistently contributed and asked Hugh specific questions if my fellow class mates could not assist me.

2. Actually record the amount of homework you’re doing so you don’t fall off track and become overwhelmed by Broadcast Media.

I consistently kept a log book where I constructed lists that I worked on each week. Overall my work load equaled 8 hours per week for this subject.

My final participation entry focused on immersing myself further in Seth’s online community. I feel as though I neglected this area slightly which is exemplified in my poor, unconfident HTML skills. Although I watched the basic videos and continually used this page to source other peoples blogs, perhaps I could have focused more of my attention onto the HTML tutorial videos. Additionally, I focused on a criteria that concerned the group work for hypertext essay. I feel I have adhered to this criteria given I have constantly prioritised this group work. In regards to this assignment, my strengths lie in written communication and organisation so I heavily assisted the group with collaborating Annotated Bibliography ideas whilst establishing a contextualising statement, also organising group meetings.

What do you think you have done well?

Based on the answers given above, I feel as though blogging, particularly relating outside material to the course has been my major strength. It is also the task that I have enjoyed undertaking the most given I’ve been able to adopt an alternative writing style to academic writing. This has enabled me to find a tone of voice that meets half way between personal and academic writing.

What do you think you have learnt to do better?

Throughout this semester I have learnt to utilise different modes of writing in the Network. In particular, I have learnt how to become a better blogger. By this I mean I now know how to create a blogging experience through visual textures, adopting a more personal tone and establishing an overall blogging voice that combines my own style and a slightly academic style. I have also learnt to write visually in the Network as exemplified through the image based narrative in my hypertext essay.

What do you think you could have done better?

To date, I could have focused more on writing HTML in the Network. As opposed to copying HTML code I could have typed text myself to familiarise and remember specific codes. Additionally, I could have watched more tutorial videos and perhaps contacted Hugh when I was having difficulties as opposed to suppressing them.

Hypertext Essay

Hypertexting a reflection

In this hypertext essay the easiest aspect has been translating my own and some of my groups research in the annotated bibliographies into a form that can be presented in a hypertext essay. My previous skills with both creative and academic essay writing has enabled me to highlight the main points from the annotated bibliography and apply them to the hypertext as rephrased and more colloquial forms of text suitable for a news channel. Additionally, my previous skills with Photoshop enabled me to easily construct the news headline images we intend to link to the Internet as each of our main pages. Moreover, developing the experience and the overall concept of the hypertext essay was also an easier aspect given the lecture we received from Mike. This lecture enabled me to more easily comprehend an experience that was simultaneously informative of Manovich’s argument.

The most difficult aspect of this hypertext essay has been indeed learning to write in the Network using HTML coding. Having had no prior knowledge or experience with this form of text I have found it particularly difficult as actually applying the skills learnt in online videos can not always be as easy as what the video says. However, I have endured these videos and feel I now have the ability to undertake basic coding.

Overall, the hypertext essay task has informed us of how to write using different forms of texts, in a different style, using a different medium and tone. The mounting presence of the Internet in the field of the media and communications industry means that we are now equipped with the basic skills to undertake online based jobs that are becoming more prevalent within the field. Additionally, working in groups reflects industry practice and fosters idea sharing and consistent collaboration that is expressed in the communications industry. This task also reflects the notion of how as separate authors, we are still able to unite our work and form connections between it through hyperlinks. The process of incorporating smaller amounts of texts as well as visual material to inform a narrative also form as other methods of writing in the Network that aim in retaining the readers attention as they experience a webpage.

Uncategorized

Online lecture activity

Why is it your favourite? 

My body: A Wunderkammer by Shelley Jackson was particularly interesting as it provided visual material to assist in directing and conveying its narrative. Given the nature of our visual culture, I feel it is necessary for most hypertext essays to offer a textual but more importantly, a visual experience as well. Jackson’s drawings were both personal, intimate and artistic that correlated closely to the overall tone/experience of the piece written in the first person. Additionally, from my own personal experience when using the internet, these images were successful in capturing the viewers attention for longer amounts of time than the other three examples. Jackson acknowledges that people have reduced attention spans on the Internet and by providing visual material we are able to explore her narrative more quickly and easily. Moreover, this was also assisted by the personal anecdotes that could be enjoyed and interpreted regardless of your knowledge and your position in the text.

What characteristics in this work would you adopt for your own hypertext essay?

From this work I would adopt the visual characteristics that assist in maintaining the viewers attention whilst providing a more aesthetically pleasing and artistic experience. Additionally, I would adopt smaller paragraphs much like the ones Jackson uses to further maintain my viewers’ attention span. Unfortunately, given the academic nature of our own hypertext essays it would be difficult to adopt a personal tone but for future reference this is a convention I would definitely utilises as it is more captivating and understandable.

Hypertext Essay

The text that will appear in our hypertext essay

It seems stupid that I would even consider writing my hypertext text on Word, I’m gonna blog it. Just a reminder that my allocated pages are the “weather page” and the “introductory page”.

HEADLINE: In todays news we’re seeing the developments of spatial montage spread to a global scale.

 

“Manovich’s text surrounding the language of new cinema argues that individuals’ familiarity with dense information surfaces, particularly multiple graphic user interfaces on a computer will eventually result in a new form of multiple narrative cinema called spatial montage. Contemporary society’s adjustment and subjection to viewing multiple screens, as demonstrated through playing video games, watching televisions news reports and using computer desktops illustrates how we are now accustomed to “switching our attention rapidly from one program to another, from one set of windows and commands to another” (Manovich 2001). Manovich (2001) argues that by similarly incorporating multiple streams of audiovisual information into cinema this may be more satisfying than the single stream of traditional cinema we’re witnessing today”.

HEADLINE: Todays forecast is predicting a strong spatial montage with a top of 25 degrees. 

“Manovich argues that because of individuals’ subjection to multiple screens, the notion of a split screen cinema experience will be acceptable amongst audiences. He suggests that the interactive screen has become a dominant cultural paradigm, experienced by individuals when playing video games, watching television news and music videos, reading graphic novels, and perhaps most importantly, when using a computer desktop (Manovich 2001). As a result of this, Manovich proposes that our adjustment to reading “the many windowed visual screen” (Bizzocchi 2009) has the power to reshape our expectation of cinema.

In her article, Malte illustrates how “the emphasis upon fragmented and multiplied display relates largely to the cinema’s demonstrated capacity for negotiating the meaning and significance of media change to a wider audience” (2008). Since the development of television, cinema has consistently aimed to seek new and invigorating ways of maintaining its audience. Bizzocchi (2009) outlines that “in order for cinema to exist in [contemporary] popular culture, amongst the video games, internet and variety of mobile phone platforms, it must employ a hypermediated aesthetic to keep up with developing trends.” If audiences are “capable of switching among multiple screens of the computer desktop’s Graphic User Interface” then it is perfectly understandable that they’re capable of “parsing a controlled and well crafted multi framed cinematic narrative” (Bizzocchi 2009). he fragmented and multiplied display

Furthermore, spatial montage enhances a viewer’s interactive experience with a film. A “multi-framed film offers a visualised version of increased narrative bandwidth” (Bizzocchi 2009) that works on a narrative level, a structural level and on a visual level making a viewer more actively engaged with a film given they’re offered the opportunity to piece together the narrative presented. Manovich (2001) illustrates how “images do not replace each other in spatial montage, but remain on the screen throughout the movie, with each new image juxtaposed not just with the image that preceded it but with all the other images presented on the screen”. As a result of this “time becomes spatialised, distributed over the surface of that screen” (Manovich 2001). From this we can infer that everything on the cinema screen is presented to the viewer, enabling them to channel through a non-linear narrative where nothing is erased. Essentially the viewer is offered the flexibility to construct their own narrative or re-wind the film’s story, similarly to how we engage with other forms of digitalised technologies”.

Technological advancements in cinema have consistently shocked audiences through the creation of impossible realities. Since the establishment of the Kinetoscope in 1892, early directors such as George Melies and the Lumiere Brothers saw cinema as a new technological means of astounding audience members. Film technology’s illusionistic capacity formed as a means of luring individuals into an illusion. Whilst spectators were captivated by this illusion they were simultaneously aware of the artifice employed, making viewers marvel at the methods used to construct film.

Much like the Kinetoscope, contemporary computers also possess the ability to create films that shock spectators and draw them into a constructed reality. Film industries, particularly that of Hollywood aim to “fool audiences into believing that shots were produced with live actors on location” (Manovich 2001). Manovich (2001) suggests that “while embracing computers as a productivity tool, cinema refuses to give up its unique cinema-effect, an effect which, according to Christain Metz’s penetrating analysis made in the 1970s, depends upon narrative form, the reality effect, and cinema’s architectural arrangement all working together.” More specifically, the reality effect a film has on spectators often becomes ambiguous when computers are used to generate effects used in a scene. Whilst computer technologies work primarily to create depth and force a focus amongst audience members, the artifice employed is never far from the minds of the spectators. In his article, Metz (1976) outlines how the “spectator lets himself be carried away – perhaps deceived, for the space of a second – by the anagogic powers belonging to a diegetic film, and he begins to acts; but it is precisely this action that awakens him, pulls him back from his brief lapse into a kind of sleep, where the action had its root, and ends up by restoring the distance between the film and him.” It is through “3D animation, compositing, mapping, paint retouching and other technical elements requiring computers that filmmakers are able to submerse viewers into a familiar reality that is physically impossible their normal world” (Manovich 2001). Filmmakers rely on technologies to heighten the realness of the fictional world that has been created”.

 

Uncategorized

Adopted-a-blog

There was a slight confusion between me and this blog exercise. I apologise in advanced Hugh. I accidentally thought we were meant to adopt one of our own blog entries and write about it. So, when you stumble upon an entry about Robert Altman and spatial montage with a big description about it underneath ignore that or hook me up with a few extra points.

Upon this next entry, I have chosen to adopt a food blog titled, The Stone Soup. I’m very much accustomed to sticking to film blogs such as /Film throughout the day but when it hits 6:30pm I’m usually all over this blog to gage ideas on what I can eat and how I can cook it. What is most appealing about this blog is not only its content but also its visual textures. The title of the blog adopts a somewhat medieval style that fits well with the concept of stone soup, an old folk story about hungry strangers who persuade local towns people to give them food. A pleasant image of a hip cartoon rhubarb is situated next to the title, uniting the concept of stone soup with fresh, easy and healthy meals that can be shared between many people. Moreover, the text used throughout the blog is bold and well spaced, making it ten times more easy to comprehend instructions when your laptop is positioned on the kitchen table and you’re 2 metres away stirring a pot and adding a teaspoon of brown sugar.

This blog incorporates multiple images and videos that makes your cooking experience far more advanced than looking at a cook book. The images of the meals are gigantic making them incredibly appealing and difficult to choose. Moreover, the list of ingredients are visually shown and the cooking methods are actually presented through video clips. And given the personal tone of the blog writing here, you’re easily convinced that these recipes (which they are) come straight from the heart of Jules Clancy and as a result, must be incredible.

The blog possesses a number of easily comprehensible and diverse categories from which you can search for food based on whether it includes meat, eggs, tofu etc or the location of where it is cooked. Additionally, the comments people leave are incredibly exciting and offer further information and ratings of the specified meals.

Overall, the experience of this blog is fresh, crisp and almost cleansing inspiring healthy eating. Everything looks immaculate and the photographs are sharp and bright to make the food look appealing. This is further endorsed through the white background of the blog. The blogs content is informative and casual, and thankfully, it is not bombarded with multiple outlandish advertisements. The most you see here is the promotion of a cook book that actually makes you want to by it.

This blog is highly recommended, 8/10 blog stars.

Uncategorized

Robert Altman’s Spatial Narratives

In the cinema of Robert Altman, every sound is dubbed in post production. Regularly, characters’ dialogue is overlaid to construct multitrack sounds that correlate closely to his panoramic camera. Altman’s camera is often omnipresent as it surveys various different character situations or merely gazes off to focus on an item with little to no importance in furthering the film’s narrative.

Altman’s films, in particular that of 3 Women (1977), MASH (1970) and Gosford Park (2001) illustrate an overt parallel with Manovich’s concept of spatial montage and spatial narrative. The presence of multitrack sounds and use of panorama offer the audience an opportunity to decide upon the character they wish to listen to and whom they decide to watch. In this case Altman utilises an “audio montage”, a term I coin in relation to this blog entry.

Spatial montage offers us an immersive or active experience through the medium of film. Similarly to how Altman defied the conventional methods of film practice and narrative in the 1970s, spatial montage has created its own movie brat pack in contemporary society, offering the public another alternative genre and/or viewing experience in cinemas. The interactive viewing experience offered by spatial montage is reflected in Altman’s layered audio that enables the viewer or listener to decide on the voice they wish to focus on. As a result this furthers the viewer’s own knowledge as to what is occurring in the narrative, or the sub-narratives that simultaneously occur between characters. Certainly, Altman’s large ensemble casts permit the director to create as many plot lines as possible within his films, offering the viewer multiple choices and points of interest.

In his article Manovich outlines that…

“spatial montage or spatial narrative had played a prominent role in European visual culture for centuries. From Giotto’s fresco cycle at Capella degli Scrovegni in Padua to Courbet’s ‘A Burial at Ornans,’ artists presented a multitude of separate events within a single space, whether the fictional space of a painting or the physical space that can be taken in by the viewer all at once. In the case of Giotto’s fresco cycle and many other fresco icon cycles, each narrative event is framed separately, but all of them can be viewed together in a single glance.”

Altman’s films are often compared to large canvases from which he paints with motion. Similarly to the spatial narratives present in the classical art works listed above, Altman constructs his own spatial narratives through his characters that appear simultaneously on screen. These classical canvas forms of art that Altman draws on, or lyrically paints through his camera lens are intertextually referenced within his film MASH (1970). There is a scene within MASH that depicts the cast of doctors and nurses having a last supper for a character who intends to commit suicide. Altman positions his cast to resemble da Vinci’s, The Last Supper that forms as a self-conscious reference to his own form of cinema that corresponds to a canvas painting. Whilst also creating an overt link between the character who intends to commit suicide and Jesus, but this is the point of least significance being made here.

When reflecting on my Annotated Bibliography it causes me grief that I failed to mention Robert Altman and how his cinema closely relates to that of spatial montage in my personal experience blog.

It successfully illustrates how I am combining the features of this course with outside material, combining the conventions of Robert Altman with the concept of spatial montage discussed in lectures. Additionally, I have incorporated a number of links and images in this entry to ensure that readers can successfully understand my entry by looking up terms that may seem foreign to them. This blog entry also captures my blog tone quite well. It verges in-between a formal and semi-formal tone that suits my writing style, and is a tone I’m more comfortable writing in. Moreover, the blog entry constructs a clear idea that is reinforced through imagery and also the use of examples. Additionally, this entry gives me the opportunity to write about my all time favourite director, reveal his obscure conventions and draw on a scene from MASH, that I would usually have only had the opportunity to speak about briefly in a conversation where people probably would not have found it that interesting. Plus, it also expresses a number of points surrounding Altman that can be elaborated and worked upon in further blog entries. Overall, this blog present a good and flowing structure that is easily comprehensible (in my opinion).