The Final Say

October 31st, 2008

There’s not a great deal to say at this point. PP2 has definitely been the subject that I’ve enjoyed the most. It was refreshing to have a free reign with our ideas; choosing to follow the path we desired. It doesn’t seem that the other PP2 groups had this luxury. I understand that having constraints can be great; however it’s also as beneficial to see what you can come up with from a relatively blank canvass. It’s possible that some of the lecturers had an overbearing involvement in the direction of their groups. In contrast to this, Paul made sure we were all on track, but he understood that we are the students and the assignment is ours to tackle. He gave us helpful and constant feedback, but never tried to change our ideas or limit the creative base from which our films stemmed. It became quite an organic process in the end.
As far as our film goes, I’m really happy with it. I can safely say that it’s my best work to date. There have been some nervous moments and some creative differences along the way. Nevertheless, I think this has helped us create a more polished finished product. Our group consists of contrasting personalities with varying skills, and this has resulted in a film that I can safely say we are all proud of. I am excited to see what all the other groups have produced for the screening. It’ll be a happy moment when I’m sitting in the theatre watching something that I’ve put so much work into.

Self Assessment

October 17th, 2008

A Final Reflection

I found the seminar series extremely beneficial. Speaking with individuals who are in jobs that we’d like makes perfect sense. All of the groups sourced relevant speakers who all had helpful pieces of information to offer us. To be able to ask questions of people who may one day be giving us a job is a great element of the course. Through the seminars we were encouraged to contact people in the industry. This active participation can only benefit us when looking for a job following our degree.
The seminar process has highlighted to me that working amongst a group is so much more efficient than alone. We were all able to achieve so much as everyone chipped in along the way. Within a group people can work to their strengths, and when this occurs the outcome is a much richer one.
The team effort has also helped to develop my trust in others. I like to make sure everything is done in the best way possible. At time this finds me watching over others do their job. However, the seminar series has made me realise that there are a lot of people who are better at areas than me. So if I can do my little bit well then the rest of it will take care of itself. Knowing that you can rely on others is a refreshing feeling that makes the activity far more enjoyable.

The process has also highlighted the importance of networking and involving yourself in the industry. One of the speakers mentioned that there are probably hundreds of geniuses out there working in their rooms at home. You can be as talented as you like, but if you don’t interact with your peers and make yourself known then your talented won’t leave your front door. So over the coming years I will work hard to secure relevant contacts and acquire a database of people who can help me in my resulting career.

To be honest it doesn’t bother me how smoothly the seminars were run. The content is what I was there for. We’re not studying to be event organisers.
Regardless of this though, our group (Writing) was organised and ran the seminar with professionalism. My involvement was mainly around generating the questions for the speakers, organising the room, and greeting guests. I feel I did this very well and solidly contributed to the running of the seminar. Our group communicated mainly via email and collaborated well throughout the whole process.
I attended the majority of the seminars. When I didn’t it was for good reason; I wasn’t sitting at home watching Wife Swap or something.

The only criticism that I’d have is that the seminar groups were perhaps still too large. I think some group members ended up doing much more than others. This was not because some individuals were lazy, it was more so to do with the fact that there weren’t enough jobs to healthily spread around amongst the number of members.
FINAL GRADE: HD

Work Attachment

October 17th, 2008

I began my work attachment with a week’s experience (40 hrs) at Channel 10 in South Yarra. I am more interested in becoming involved with television than film so a network seemed like a relevant place to undertake my internship. I began the week observing all aspects of the morning show 9am with David & Kim. Everyone was helpful and explained how the whole process worked. To be honest it’s a repetitive process. The crew seemed to be on autopilot for the majority of the show’s duration.
I saw the show being created from both the panel room and out on the floor. This gave me a more thorough understanding as to what’s involved in a live broadcast. In that regard it was a beneficial experience. Having witnessed two days worth of 9am I asked if I could move downstairs to the newsroom. This gave me the flexibility to tailor my time at Channel 10 according to what interested me. I wanted to demonstrate to them that I was a capable editor. I find that having the tag of the ‘work attachment’ student can leave you open to being swept aside. I felt that I hadn’t been given the chance to work on anything tangible so far. As such, I asked to be taught how to use the editing software that they had in the news department. This proved to be a positive move. I was assigned an editor and he showed me the basics of the rather primitive program that they use. It was a far cry from Final Cut Pro. Nevertheless, my previous editing experience proved worthwhile, and the editors were impressed with my ability. This is when my attachment started to take off. I felt like I was learning some hands on experience instead of watching the whole time. I requested to be given old news stories that I could practice cutting. After 4 or 5 stories I was reasonably competent with the software’s interface.
Along with this I was given the opportunity to go out in the field with the camera crew and shoot a few stories. It was an interesting process. I observed the politics involved with gathering stories and the appropriate way to conduct oneself. As well as this I was given the chance to record much of the sound for the story. It felt good to be involved in the news gathering process.

It was a helpful process to go through; more so in outlining the negatives of such a work environment. I was mainly involved in the news department; doing some editing, out in the field one day, and pretty much watching how it all works. I cut a story for the 5 o’clock news at one point, but on the whole the news is not an attractive job prospect for me. In that regard this attachment was a beneficial process. It’s always helpful learning what you don’t like within the industry. It’s cemented my belief that I want to be in a creative sector of the media. Regurgitating what’s happening around me is mundane and not very challenging.

In contrast to this, I spent a day (8 hrs) at Fremantle Media with the story liners from Neighbours. The work environment wasn’t far removed from the news department; however the content involved was the stark contrast. They spent the day thinking up ideas for future episodes and bringing that to the table in a boardroom discussion. This is a job that I could happily do. I really enjoy tackling problems and putting together stories for screen.
During my time there I learnt about the scripting process, where they source their writers from, and more of an insight into the development stage of a long running series in general. It helped to reassure me that a creative environment like Fremantle Media is where I’d like to work. The experience also boosted my confidence. At times I feel like I’m not as skilled or as talented as people in creative positions. Sitting in with the storylining team completely quashed this theory. The storyliners have come from varying backgrounds and are not hugely impressive people. Having confidence in one’s ability is a great quality to possess and shows to people that you at least come across as someone who can capably do the job at hand. Many positions within the media don’t seem to require skills that only a few people have. It’s not really an industry where you can measure someone’s performance in a tangible way. It seems that reaching the position you want is much harder than actually doing the job at hand. I know I haven’t really witnessed many working environments, but from what I’ve seen I’m confident that I could capably slot in to most of the jobs on offer.

Another aspect to my work attachment is a studio assistant job that I got earlier this year. I’ve worked about 50 hrs for them. It was advertised through the RMIT email system. The job was for a position at New Street Films in Richmond, which is a studio that’s involved with event organising, music videos, advertisements, the spring racing carnival etc. In the interview the two managers explained to me that I would be doing odd jobs around the studio as well as helping out with shoots and events. I was under the impression that I’d be given the chance to have a substantial involvement in the company. This hasn’t really come to fruition. I spend most of the time doing deliveries, painting the studio, and cleaning up the warehouse. I’ve been involved with a few shoots, but not as regularly as I’d hoped. I guess it’s difficult to expect much when I have yet to graduate. I understand that you have to be prepared to do crappy jobs in the beginning; however it’s not a great feeling when anyone off the street could do what I’ve been hired to. It’ll be good to put on the resume, although it’ll be a nice feeling to have a degree behind me. That way I can have the confidence that my ideas and skills are beneficial to the company and worth acknowledging.

Further to this I spent a day (8 hrs) on the film set for a Holeproof television advertisement. I secured this attachment through Margot Gerr, who is a producer at Whybin TWA. It was great to observe how the shoot is arranged and who is involved with the production. In particular I wanted to speak with the person who came up with the concept for the ad. His name is Rob Hibbert. I had a great chat with him and asked him all about his job and how best to crack into the industry. Rob’s background is in copyrighting, an area that I’m going to look into if I want to undertake some further education. I really enjoy responding to briefs and thinking about ways to advertise products.
I also had the opportunity to speak with the clients about where they are coming from and how the whole relationship works between client, advertising company, and production studio.

In 2007 I also worked as a 2nd camera assistant for an independent feature called From Parts Unknown. Joffa Hardy, an RMIT Media graduate, is the producer who I liaised with to organise the attachment. I spent five full days (40 hrs +) working on set. It definitely gave me a deeper insight into the work a crew puts in to a shoot. If you really loved being a gaffer or a camera assistant then a film set would be fine. However, I find it difficult to sit back at let others direct the ship. If I’m not in one of the important creative roles then I find it hard to become motivated. I was working with a great bunch of people in a fun environment, but I have other areas of interest that I wish to pursue before slugging it out on a film set.

On the whole the work attachment aspect of the degree is really beneficial. Obtaining some industry insight and experience is a great way to work through what you hope to do as a career in the future. Many of my attachments allowed me to cross off possible jobs I may be interested in. Witnessing the industry before you enter it is a fantastic way to make sure that you apply for the right jobs when you finish the course. I think all of us have wondered what we are going to do following the course. The work attachment program allows us to try before we buy in a way. It has helped me gain a firmer understanding to what I’m interested in and the career path I wish to pursue in the coming years.

What’s her motivation?

October 6th, 2008

We were showing Paul the rough cut of our film when he mentioned something that hit home for me. It was one of those ‘oh yeah’ kind of moments when someone introduces a new way of looking at things.
In our film there is a moment where the main character is confronted by a checkout girl, who prevents him from leaving the store. The problem is that she isn’t introduced to the audience earlier in the film, and so it is unclear what the motivation for her actions is. Without motivation the audience is left with questions in their mind. It became apparent to me that I had written this character into the script purely out of convenience, rather than exploring her character and working out what was motivating her.
As this is the case we’ve decided to scrap this character all together. The narrative retains its structure, probably more so now.

This little interaction has highlighted a shortfall in my writing in the past that I will avoid in the future. I have tended to use characters to drive the story without looking into each character themselves. I have made characters do what I’d like them to say and do rather than how they would normally react in the given situation.

Shoot Night 3

October 1st, 2008

DSCN0213.JPG

Monique, our makeup artist, did a great job. Especially with our female character Anne. When we had a meeting with Monique she showed us her work and Sussan and I selected the look that most suited our film. The finished product is what I had in mind. It’s a bit nerve racking waiting to see the outcome of the makeup. Thankfully it all came up well.

DSCN0196.JPG

We didn’t have a mother until the last minute. Thankfully a friend Grace was happy to oblige. She did what was asked of her and I think this element of the film could help capture time passing and contribute to the film’s cohesion.

Shoot Night 2

October 1st, 2008

DSCN0174.JPG

The second night ran much more smoothly. We were tighter with our set ups and more precise with the decisions we needed to make. We are probably the smallest crew so although everyone has their assigned roles it seems that we all end up chipping in wherever a gap appears. It’s definitely been helpful having Emma as 1st AD.

DSCN0171.JPG

In a few of the scenes we’ve attempted to choreograph the characters’ movements. In this shot Matt and Jack are stacking their respective shelves and moving in unison. It came out really well, but for some reason we chose to shoot it in the soft drink aisle instead of the canned soup section. We may or may not be able to get around this minor detail. Sometimes the answers are in the edit.

DSCN0158.JPG

One of the beauties about shooting in a supermarket is the set itself. The long walls of produce provide us with a myriad of ways to shoot each shot. Whether or not our film is a success is still uncertain, however I’m certain that we’ve shot some very nice stuff along the way.

1, 2, 3, 4 Turn

September 19th, 2008

For one of the scenes in our film we have 8 checkout girls all in a line with 8 customers wheeling trolleys towards them. All of the girls will be wearing the same outfits. We are planning to choreograph this scene, which will be our biggest challenge to date. Organising this amount of people will require clarity of thought and direction. I’m really excited and a little nervous to see how it will all come up on camera. I am also somewhat apprehensive as to who will turn up. I have spoken to all of then extras and confirmed their attendance; however I won’t be satisfied until I see them all standing behind those counters.

Something like the Daft Punk video clip Around the World is not far from what I’m looking for. Could probably model a few moves on this:

And of course OK Go’s Here it Goes Again:

Feist’s 1234:

Or this Riva advertisement:

It’ll problably end up looking more like this though:

Hang Me Out To Dry

September 19th, 2008

Sometimes it doesn’t matter how much preparation you do, things can always go wrong.
It was a week before our shoot. We’d secured the male supermarket outfits and were on the hunt for matching female fitted shirts. I came across 2 shirts in this store called Hipster. They were the right colour and fit; we just needed 8 of them. The lady said that she could order more in for us and that they’d be ready well before the shoot. I thought ‘great, all sorted.’ I asked her to call me if there were any problems. She said ‘fine.’
The pick up day came. I went to collect the shirts, but when I got there the lady informed me that they were unable to get them. I already had little faith in people, but now I have next to no trust in anyone. Most of the time people are quite unimpressive.
Anyway, I had some thinking to do and some calls to make. All the stores I rang were charging more than we were willing to pay or had the wrong colour for what we needed. I was having dinner with my mum and her friend Gail. Gail is an arty lady and has good ways of getting around things. I popped to her the quandary we had and she suggested clothes dye. I was able to get the same shirts from hipster, but in whit not blue. So I considered her suggestion and thought it was worth a shot.
The last few days have been spent dying these white shirts blue. It’s taken a few separate attempts, but I think the colour I’ve got now will work well. When what’s done is done you’ve got to put it behind you and create the best solution for the problem at hand. Hopefully the shirts work on camera.

Shoot Day 1

September 17th, 2008

Took a bit longer than I’d like. The shoot went well overall though. We got some great shots and all worked together really nicely.

DSCN0147.JPG

DSCN0133.JPG

One of the groups broke the wheels that attached to the dolly. As this was the case we needed to employ a bit of last minute troubleshooting. The dolly wheels were much like trolley wheels, so the supermarket trolley seemed the obvious substitute. It’s difficult to say how it went because I’m not on camera, but Matt’s reaction would suggest a positive result.

DSCN0143.JPG

DSCN0140.JPG

So far we’ve used a lot of moving shots. I think this will work well as the nature of the film is meant to be quite disorientating at times. Both the dolly and jib have had a decent work out during the first shoot.

DSCN0134.JPG

DSCN0123.JPG

James and Matt (actors) are nice guys and got along well, which made the shoot far more pleasant and productive. They began playing around with their characters and a few useful things came from that. I was happy with how they acted. Things are shaping up well for day 2.

Costumes, Makeup, and everything in between

September 4th, 2008

Now it’s time to start focussing on the little things, which can make a big difference. The main logistical components of our film are in place. So now we need to secure at least one makeup artists and also begin thinking about and collecting the costumes for our actors. We experimented with an olive brown shirt at the test shoot. It looks quite good on film. We didn’t want to go with white because that becomes problematic in films. We also need to be aware of the current supermarket colours and whether they mind us wearing those colours. I’m sure as we are shooting it in Safeway we could quite comfortably use the Coles blue. I would be highly surprised if Coles had any legal ownership of the colour blue that their employees wear. Cadbury attempted to claim the unique purple that they use as their own but lost their case in court.
Another small issue we may have is the fact that the boss in our film is very small. He is meant to be quite an intimidating figure. We will have to convey this through other means than stature. This is where a skilled make up artist could come in handy.