Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
About Blog Central
Blog Central is a space for RMIT academics and senior staff to blog about their areas of expertise and interests.
The views and opinions expressed by the authors on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of RMIT University.
All are welcome to contribute. If you're interested in blogging, please contact Zoë Kleeborn from University Communications.

Measuring hidden unemployment: Part 2
This post is a follow up to another article by Dr De Silva. Read the previous post here.
Recently the ABS released the latest unemployment statistics. These figures were remarkably good given the mediocre global economic environment. Notably, the release received little media attention and the attention it did receive was fairly critical.
The main criticism relates to the definition of being employed. Readers of this blog would be familiar with this issue already. Further, readers would also be familiar with an alternative measure, Effective Full time Unemployment Rate (EFUR), that is relatively more robust than the standard measure.
Below is an update of the national EFUR together with some detailed analysis at the state level. An important thing to keep in mind when looking at the following graphs is that the EFUR is a relative measure – it is not an absolute measure. In other words it should be interpreted relative to its past.
Chart 1: National Unemployment Rates (Source: author's calculations, ABS CAT 6202)
According to Chart 1 the EFUR indicates that national labour market conditions are worse than the pre-GFC conditions of the mid-2000s. In particular the EFUR seems to be hovering at rates consistent with the experience of the early-mid 1990s and 2001. The standard unemployment rate at these times was around 10 per cent and 7 per cent respectively. No doubt some of the difference between the alternative measures is attributable to changes to working conditions.
A (selected) state level comparison is presented below. Interestingly, the labour market conditions for Western Australia appear to be improving, approaching pre-GFC levels. This is in contrast to the labour market conditions in other states (considered) which seem to be showing very little, if any, sign of approaching pre-GFC levels.
In summary, the EFUR indicates that the labour market conditions across Australia are notably worse than the conditions leading up to the GFC – with WA perhaps being the exception.
Dr Ashton de Silva is a senior lecturer at the School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University. He has a PhD in econometrics from Monash University, the results of which have been published in leading academic research journals. Ashton’s research interests include economic policy analysis, forecasting and property market analysis.